Where the crawdads sing afterthought
I will not say anything about the plot, because I knew the plot before reading the book and I think it weakened the impact for me.
I thought it is very good at describing nature, how nature enrich people's life. I liked the way it jumped from different times of the protagonist's life. This way of writing kept me engaged. There were detective element and court room drama, which I read some reviews saying it was weak, I tend to agree. But they were interwoven into a nicely paced rhythm. I thought it was nice.
I thought it was a heart warming story. These people helped the protagonist with compassion in a way not intrusive at all. The people in town however were merely decorative.
I thought the poems in the story were kind weak. The romantic love plotlines were a bit weak as well. The best story line were between Tate and his father, the description of them together was fascinating to me, as well as Jumpin' and the protagonist.
I already know the ending before reading the story, and because of this, I tried to see if I could find the clues during reading. But I could not, except 1 clue.
I felt the languages used in the book was quite poetic, saved from poems used by the protagonist, I thought those were weak, except the last one. I felt the ending was a bit rushed because it was concluded in a summary style. Of course, knowing it before hand was a mistake...
I was reading how LouisePenny created the character of detectiveGamache. She said she created a male character with all the traits she admired. I felt the author for this book did the same thing too.
The only poem I thought was good written by the protagonist:
The firefly
easy
as flashing
valentines.
But like a lady
firefly
They hid a secret
call to die.
No comments:
Post a Comment