I just finished watching undisputedof shannonandskip talking about scot'sanger. shannonandskip's chemistry really is incredible. We all know where skipstands. butshannon is the one medium who kept the balance and stay reasonable. they talk like friends, with real opinions and contents. sometimes, i'd feel talk show just so they could stir the motion of the audience. But besides the topics and their acting. the chemistry was so in harmony. and when they look back, would they be as bitter as mikeandscot? I don't think so. because there's sincerity in both of shannonandskip.
scotis really angry. and likeshannon said, it's very understandable. that doc recorded mike's last dance. why does it show every embarrassing moment ofscott's career? but the wayscott express this anger, at all direction, it's very bad for him and for history, which he is part of. He's throwing poop at himself. But who caused this in the end? it is actuallymike.
why are they doing the last dance now? what motivates mike now? it's lbj. because lbj really moved mike a little bit in his heart. and for that, mikeput out a documentary. but i bet while he's making the doc, watching all the highlights and thinking back. the many what if scenarios must have go through his mind.
i watched the last dance very late, just 6 months ago, i think. before watching it, i already watched and read many comments. one of the most fascinating opinions was about bull's manager. a lot of people say the doc trashed that manager. but some say at the end, the documentary actually gave him back some credit. But in the midst of scott'sanger. shannonasked a very interesting question, why putting all the scott's embarrassing moment in the doc? and here's what i believe the reason why. In the process of making the doc, mike'sview on the manager started to shift. What if Mike never left? the coach left, scottleft, but with that general manager's vision, they could acquire tracymcgrady in place of scott, what would happen then?
mike has been managing a team of his own for quite a while now. his vision has changed since his player year. I think to include Scott's many embarrassing moments was in his psyche a regret, not letting the manager do his thing. let the manager manager HR, I will lead whoever he acquired to victory. And it was the manager, who always viewed scottwasa replaceable piece.
shannonand many other people said scott's has misdirected his anger at mike. but i think it's not. because the value ofscott's inmike's mind should never be replaceable, at least in scott'sview. but now it does. if scott's fault is in how he expressed his anger now, mike'sffault is making a documentary and throw his most trusted team mate under the bus because he himself could not stop wondering the what ifs.
it is truly sad, because i was one of many who lived and amazed bymike and the chicagobull. for 20 years, they are the team. but now the doc brought something out, it felt llike the team was never really there. and all the effort was fruitless. the champion is the fruit? or the team mates? or the money they made? it's just sad. I still loved the game, but i played less and less each year. I shall still treasure those years and think they are the greatest team andmike the greatest player. but something is different.